In recent days, Haribo has found itself at the center of controversy following an advertising campaign that blurred the line between cannabis edibles and gummy candies. What may seem like a simple publicity stunt has sparked a broader debate on branding, regulation, and public perception of cannabis.
The Haribo Incident
The campaign featured playful wordplay and packaging visuals reminiscent of cannabis-infused edibles. Despite not containing any THC or CBD, the marketing approach drew criticism for imitating cannabis products—raising ethical concerns about brand responsibility and consumer safety, especially for younger audiences.
Public and Regulatory Reactions
While some internet users reacted with humor, others—particularly parents, activists, and lawmakers—voiced strong criticism. They warned that this kind of messaging could contribute to the normalization of cannabis use among children and teens, even unintentionally.
A Chance for Reflection
This incident highlights the growing need to reevaluate how cannabis culture is interpreted, exploited, or trivialized in mainstream marketing. As legalization expands globally, so does the responsibility to communicate cannabis-related themes with clarity, ethics, and transparency.
Clorophobia’s Artistic Response
Clorophobia responds with a unique NFT inspired by this episode—turning critique into creativity. The artwork is a digital provocation that underlines the fine line between creative inspiration and commercial appropriation. It invites viewers to engage critically with how cannabis is portrayed in public discourse.
Discover the exclusive NFT on OpenSea and Rarible, discover the collection https://opensea.io/collection/clorophobia-archives and join our movement for environmental awareness and artistic resistance.
